We gather useful software and tips to save your time and money for your business.
Wrike and Jira are two pieces of project management software that often get compared to each other in the same breath. Both are impressively powerful creations meant to help businesses organize their workflow and run things smoothly, but which one is better? That’s what we’re hoping to answer today in our complete comparison of Wrike vs Jira, so read on to find out the answer!
Wrike is a digital work management tool designed to help larger enterprises properly organize their projects and is designed for power users. It takes a mostly simple user interface and adds layers upon layers of depth in the way of extra features and power options. Launched in 2007, Wrike is now regarded as one of the best tools available when it comes to efficient project management.
Atlassian’s Jira was designed as an issue-tracking program for software developers years ago. Over time, Jira would slowly evolve and add various project management features to its toolkit. Eventually, it gained a reputation for being a fairly simple piece of software for project management, one that was suitable for users of any skill level. Nowadays, it’s not uncommon to see Jira in recommended software lists and the like.
Because of its simplistic but versatile toolset, Jira is suitable for users of almost any level, from small-scale teams to enterprise-level corporations. With its unique and easy-to-learn user interface design, new users will have an easy time managing this program. Despite this, a lack of some true power features means Jira may not fit perfectly for really big enterprises.
Wrike, thanks to its incredible set of powerful options and features, is best suited for medium to enterprise-level companies. It has a simple and easy-to-understand interface, but making use of all its tools and functions takes time and practice. With enough effort, however, Wrike is phenomenally powerful as a piece of project management software, capable of making any business run smoothly and efficiently, regardless of size.
While both Wrike and Jira are different in their own ways, some of their functionality do intersect.
Work time tracking is a key feature for many project management tools, and both of these pieces of software offer the feature. Wrike has the feature built into the service, while Jira offers it through add-ons like Tempo Timesheets, Work Time Calendar, and AIO Timesheets.
Both Wrike and Jira are capable of generating customized project reports. It’s an essential feature for any project management tool and makes sharing information and getting a more granular look at project progress as simple as clicking a button.
Jira’s Scrum Boards are a unique and powerful tool that allows agile teams to quickly break down projects into smaller, more manageable pieces of work. Thanks to this, teams using Jira can often quickly and efficiently finish bigger tasks with good organization and distribution of work.
Jira’s specialized Roadmaps are powerful and aesthetically pleasing charts that can help any user easily visualize what needs to be done. Full visibility of the tasks and progress done can keep morale up and allows for teams to properly sync up when it comes to completing work.
Automations in Jira work through a simple drag and drop formula that almost anyone can pick up and learn within an hour. It’s simple, but still robust and powerful, meaning any user who learns to make good use of the feature can automate just about anything in no time.
Atlassian allows users to use Jira as the center of DevOps practices, and unlock the extensibility of an open, diverse toolchain while keeping the ease and coordination of an all-in-one. This is a big deal for projects that involve coding and the like, as it immensely smooths out the workflow for programmers and gives them extra tools to work with when it comes to completing tasks.
Wrike’s biggest selling point is how it puts the power in the hands of users, and nowhere is this more apparent than in Wrike’s custom workflow. Through it, you get powerful macro control of every member of your team’s tasks and progression. Paired with automation, it allows users to automate and organize their operations significantly.
Gantt charts in Wrike offer greater granular control compared to those on offer from other companies. Adjusting dates and deadlines is as simple as clicking over a task and dragging it out. The colorful aesthetics also work functionally, keeping every task easy to track and manage.
Wrike’s Dashboard serves multiple purposes, being able to serve as an announcement board, a to-do board, or even just a place for notes. It keeps track of all your projects and gives you access to every option right from the dashboard itself. You can also customize the dashboard as you see fit, allowing users to tailor the workflow to fit their needs.
For enterprise teams, security and stakeholder engagement is essential. Generated documents like pie charts and graphs can be safely stored and protected through Wrike Lock, locking a client’s information behind a wall that can only be accessed by the client themselves and permitted team members.
Jira has a free package that allows you to add 10 users to your team. though you have a one-site limit, are stuck with 2GB of file storage, and can only really work on a single project. It goes up to $7.50 per user a month with the Standard package, adding a few extras to the mix like being able to add 35,000 users to your project, permissions, and roles. You also get 250GB of file storage to work with.
Going higher we’ve got the Premium package which allows you to use basically every feature on the platform on as many projects as you like. It also features unlimited storage, though it does cost $14.50 for each user. After that, there’s the price adjustable Enterprise package that has all the bells and whistles you could ask for, as well as access to early testing features.
Wrike also offers a free version, which comes with task and subtask management, cloud storage integrations and 2GB of storage to be shared between all members. There’s a Professional plan for $9.80 per user which doesn’t really add much other than more storage, Microsoft integrations, and Gantt charts.
The Business plan at $24.80 per user is pricey, but basically, a must-have for any larger scale business using Wrike, as it brings key features like automation and time tracking sheets. Finally, the Enterprise option gives you all the features you could want on top of better security options.
Overall, Jira is much more affordable, though Wrike’s power features outshine Jira’s simpler basic toolset and add-ons.
|Wrike||4 Stars(2,572 Reviews)||4.3 Stars (1,790 Reviews)||4.25 Stars (1,791 Reviews)||4.25 Stars (589 Reviews)|
|Jira||4 Stars(4,826 Reviews)||4.4 Stars(12,374 Reviews)||4.41 Stars(12,094 Reviews)||4 Stars(2,561 Reviews)|
Thanks to a lower starting price, Jira is the better option for smaller teams. The tools provided are more than enough for a smaller scale business, and it’s an excellent choice. For bigger enterprises, however, Wrike is the way to go thanks to its much more powerful set of tools. Wrike vs Jira is a fairly clear-cut comparison at the end of the day, and we hope this helps you make your choice!
Jira is quite similar to Wrike in many ways, though both tools excel at different things despite their similarities.
Yes, Wrike was built from the ground up with Agile teams in mind.
If you’re managing a large-scale enterprise, you want to choose Wrike thanks to its powerful features that give you more control over a larger number of teams and people.
Both are useful tools in the right hands and excel in different areas.
Wrike VS Smartsheet: The Ultimate Comparison
Basecamp vs Jira: A Complete Comparison
ClickUp VS Jira: 5 Critical Differences